Faithandthelaw's Blog

The law as it relates to Christians and their free exercise of religion

Posts Tagged ‘school prayer’

Prayers at School Board Meetings Struck Down

Posted by faithandthelaw on August 8, 2011

A Delaware school board’s practice of reciting prayers before public board meetings is unconstitutional, a federal appeals court has ruled.

The unanimous decision by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, in Philadelphia, comes at a time of renewed attention to prayers in the public square. Prayers before city council and county board meetings have come under greater legal scrutiny, and Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s decision to lead a prayer rally this past weekend raised concerns among civil libertarians.

Prayers before school board meetings are commonplace in the United States, though certainly not everywhere.

The 3rd Circuit case involves the 8,400-student Indian River school district in Delaware, which has had prayers at its board meetings since its founding in 1969, court papers say. In 2004, the district formalized its board meeting prayer policy, which calls for board members to rotate in leading a prayer or moment of silence to “solemnify” formal meetings. The policy says prayers may be sectarian or non-sectarian, “in the name of a Supreme Being, Jehovah, Jesus Christ, Buddha, Allah,” or any other entity.

Court papers say that in practice, prayers have almost always been Christian.

Two families challenged the board prayers as a violation of the First Amendment’s prohibition against government establishment of religion. A federal district court upheld the practice. But in its Aug. 5 decision in Doe v. Indian River School District, the 3rd Circuit court panel said the board’s policy and practices cannot be squared with the establishment clause.

The court said the key question was whether the school board’s meetings and prayers were closer to the legislative prayers upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1983 case of Marsh v. Chambers, or more like other school events in which the high court’s cases have limited school-sponsored prayers.

The court noted that students are frequently present at board meetings, including student government representatives who regularly advise the Indian River board, as well as academic and sports team members who are recognized by the board.

The 3rd Circuit concluded that the board meetings are closer to other school events, such as graduation ceremonies, in which school-sponsored prayers have been held to have a coercive effect on students.

“Regardless of whether the board is a deliberative or legislative body, we conclude that Marsh is ill-suited to this context because the entire purpose and structure of the Indian River School District revolves around public school education,” the opinion says. “The First Amendment does not require students to give up their right to participate in their educational system or be rewarded for their school-related achievements as a price for dissenting from a state-sponsored religious practice.”

The 3rd Circuit decision covers Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. The court noted that one other federal appeals court has addressed prayers before school board meetings. In a 1999 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, in Cincinnati, held that prayers before board meetings in Cleveland were barred by the establishment clause.

While some courts have extended Marsh to permit prayers before city council and county board meetings, the educational emphasis of school boards distinguishes them from those other local bodies, the 3rd Circuit court said.

The court closed its opinion by quoting an observation from the Supreme Court’s 1962 decision striking down official prayer in the New York state schools, Engel v. Vitale.

“[I]t is neither sacrilegious nor antireligious to say that each separate government in this country should stay out of the business of writing or sanctioning official prayers and leave that purely religious function to the people themselves,” the high court said in that case.

Courtesy of http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/school_law/2011/08/a_delaware_school_boards_pract.html

Posted in Hot Legal News, Attack on Christianity, Religious Freedom | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Delaware school board allowed invocation…for now

Posted by faithandthelaw on March 3, 2010

Bill Bumpas – OneNewsNow – 3/2/2010 5:00:00 AM

A ruling by a federal judge in Delaware could be a step in the right direction toward protecting school boards across the country that wish to open meetings with Christian prayer.

The U.S. Congress is allowed to open its sessions with prayer, and according to Judge Joseph Farnan, the Indian River School Board in Delaware is closer to a legislative body than a school, so it should be allowed to open its meetings in the same manner.

“Here we have an elected school board. They represent distinct districts within the school district, they have the power to levy and collect taxes for purposes of running the school district, they set policy for the school district, [and] they take an oath of office that’s nearly identical to the oath taken by the Delaware General Assembly,” explains Jason Gosselin, attorney for the school district.  “When you look at all of those things, it’s very difficult to come to a conclusion other than this is a legislative body.” 
 
In throwing out the lawsuit that was first filed in 2005 by two Jewish families, the judge also concluded that the school board did not use its prayer policy “to proselytize or advance religion,” so he believed the court “may not demand anything further” of the board. (Related article)
 
Gosselin establishes this issue has been hotly contested all over the country and the results are a mixed bag. “It’s something that I expect people will continue to fight over, and there’s going to be more disputes on this,” he predicts. “There will probably be an appeal in this case, so it’s not settled nationwide.”
 
The attorney adds that it is settled for the time being that school boards in Delaware can open meetings with prayer. An attorney for the plaintiffs has stated that an appeal to the Third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is planned.

Posted in Hot Legal News | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 721 other followers